- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
9 ^8 D, q6 D0 y$ |Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
1 r1 a) F6 C* W$ pExposure to Testosterone' j! F/ B. Y( B( D1 p2 k, Z
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2/ [- h& z9 Z/ Z
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1# Q1 Q' f2 l) A( s8 b. s# s+ o
Clinical Pediatrics9 K$ b6 Z( T: @, H! i- S
Volume 46 Number 6
/ O. i1 l$ ]7 W9 [July 2007 540-543
9 n V& _/ k% a© 2007 Sage Publications
) _& _& g' |7 X2 P10.1177/0009922806296651
/ H1 \6 I. R2 ihttp://clp.sagepub.com
3 _& R) p( I4 W3 Hhosted at
4 u! |% u' B; @$ p% i, w, ?http://online.sagepub.com
/ y: b4 P: f# ~ y- j( IPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,, h8 E o. i( q
is a significant concern for physicians. Central7 ?# A' \8 p- n( H
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated1 S8 Y7 @ f1 `8 F$ d
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
" d0 l2 W; X4 w. xa higher incidence of organic central nervous system
/ ]- F2 f& C& ^5 g: D) S' j* N) Wlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
F3 p" {! |1 J2 e {2 T, W- Bby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
* ?9 O5 W4 _, x# c: d fhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-+ S0 K: C' G" z+ R! G) A
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
4 B7 Q( M3 B6 F5 m+ {& sreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
: j2 D0 }( d; t( [4 v9 venlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
7 u1 y: s5 f& F$ zment without testicular enlargement, which was due( r* \% C; L& ?) |* Y- ]
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
) {2 l- E& t& r& n3 ?the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
( C0 ^$ v( A2 t. g! Xmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this3 A# ^3 ]5 ~" n- `# p
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of2 o( \& k2 t" F1 s' A" I
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-2 k, U2 A* U) _. ~* j! u
bly more common than the rare case report in the& b6 |) E! g' E$ O, j0 z# H
literature.4 A7 J1 `$ @# X: L8 a8 G
Patient Report
) m& X* L. V. ]3 w$ dA 16-month-old white child was referred to the
* ?, z) B" H. E2 Kendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern( ~6 U' r' D. c
of early sexual development. His mother noticed8 k# F$ f1 j6 W$ y
light colored pubic hair development when he was
# K4 @8 e# a2 xFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
( h- l7 U+ q4 H5 `1 x- [South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.$ |1 a& s: c& N: x; T
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,6 |; Z) L2 y; x- }2 j
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
% d" z- t5 Y2 w" ]% |: z. \Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;" N4 B3 q+ u0 z' {
e-mail: [email protected].0 W* T3 g, f9 n4 y* s
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
9 G4 K" W" E, y- udarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
# l2 a. Y6 m, S8 Hment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
7 A# ^- ]2 M9 R2 w( a* Q7 Twas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
- l p* C9 h- e0 h/ R4 `. m+ k6 |a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
5 j7 k3 V8 ?3 b; _4 s4 g/ T20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year9 [# H. J( o. d! }$ u% l0 G- F5 q
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
+ t7 l- }2 p4 {# O+ ]solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
2 N4 E x5 j+ x Gand his psychosocial and psychomotor development7 a. v5 V- c; ?" L5 S' [
was age appropriate.0 D2 a, d5 g5 {2 x- N# m& {$ l
The family history was remarkable for the father,
5 t) o$ G8 V) I$ n# Z2 awho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,+ n6 g8 a9 q" o& k' s
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
1 N8 b E- G, {; T1 q. ], Fheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat n) X5 J9 O0 w$ X7 T0 V
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
3 G3 V) X9 q5 D( A' V1 G$ fThe father denied taking any other medication. The
# N" a2 L( _% J. Q" jchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
) u/ T) [& N- t: @was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
$ m, A2 K6 p" ^1 V, _% W' \5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
0 z4 q5 E0 r2 m: T! E6 r4 p2 ~cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
4 l" e* G* W5 n7 d1 Utives. There were no siblings.
# S6 q) g' g% v4 Y6 IPhysical Examination
0 i% u4 A9 l0 S- I9 \ v3 e9 WThe physical examination revealed a very active, n: M- e6 N; {5 c; i
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
( m3 q. Z+ Z+ x' u. @& |) ba blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
7 o) }( U' j9 O+ Z+ g U0 E1 @# g90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
5 z8 O; B3 n' a- L6 x(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
% C6 b2 h- o; j$ `: Yvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of. b/ o+ z4 C, [' J" [- t9 k
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.: x6 e1 v' |) d5 ]# S
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for8 A( j" Y/ d, {& W' W
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of; _' @1 z5 w9 [+ [# S# c
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well/ W/ \1 ]) ^% s# Q/ z) i9 r
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around0 K: w; O: `" a/ e6 \/ p1 s1 E
540
+ o( X R$ ~% Q- `" J1 rat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from9 Q- x1 ^& f$ D' d4 P1 ?& N( W
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The; x- E4 H) f' G3 [# ?
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.: Y2 p K3 n4 O, h6 N- }" c
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
" Z: X) B' L2 n* Z9 Y/ S) f8 {% Aoily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no% w b4 ?: Y3 K3 s' ?+ r- C
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.8 {) Y) F2 u' j, M0 g4 ^+ t
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+! g1 Y' F [* t4 C
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
7 ]+ w. C0 o- x/ |of papilledema.
' m( {& C5 }1 h1 TLaboratory Evaluation
8 O2 V) r/ T& i8 jThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by4 {. z) Z2 Q3 i' ?
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
4 ?0 z( G* X6 Mlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
( }7 i9 M, Y, V2 b! L& xkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
; O) n* [+ x- r c# {showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
2 y# X5 o6 F7 R* m! X5 c3 Clating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).; N6 {- k/ x1 ]3 h
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
# x0 D' ~' O: G# U( R: ], Uurea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
" S) W' `3 J% zwithin normal range for his age. The concentration" q- q& h3 W6 n, y( x# T6 b* B/ A
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
) _" T6 z( L8 M(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
) S) ]% x: d4 S! l5 v5 G* x6 bng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-0 v. V2 }/ f: Y+ t, ^ Y/ @
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),' w0 f! p* t# O: U6 M
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
% c j9 y) u$ V2 {& P49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)0 U" Y0 J, U v9 z7 G* Y
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-& K' w! s2 o, ^4 g
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total; g0 p" {+ I4 @
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
/ b" w7 x1 f- }' m1 gand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than( q- l( g! Q5 `9 a7 m
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular! ^: T. s$ p- W4 Q! H$ h3 P
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
9 Y( z: ]! M! G! r; Rconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
z$ S! Y: h5 G; O7 i% H5 e2 }7 a(prepubertal).
9 u& o L$ P5 VThe parents were notified about the laboratory
& Y* G. Z0 A/ t# Eresults and were informed that all of the tests were0 y6 J& h) S" ~" v7 `
normal except the testosterone level was high. The' b0 W$ Q4 V0 C. P! B T: \# h
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
4 }3 K7 u& H! \' f8 i( ]3 j0 Zobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-1 q% W% ~, N) w( E1 D& n
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
, k3 g) T# Q& U+ QPhysical examination at this time revealed that the$ K2 ]' [: }9 w7 c
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
4 p2 K$ Z- q: i# Q3 o, v2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained5 G# X. L( m. u8 ?
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-8 O& x& R$ }! f6 b& y3 E
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at0 X6 }( s2 t0 E4 U2 ~, Y: ?1 Q: J" K
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2) J0 ]. r4 X# p( G5 P6 ~$ M) Z
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.% g! h/ h5 b7 e2 N+ ?. Y
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
: E8 y7 ^% i" R+ o: v1 b3 Sing frequent erections.
5 V2 K; I4 O) [Both parents were again questioned about use of% X8 W# Q8 J% Z3 K
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to! S( j+ m2 J2 M5 I1 M
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the! G& X+ B$ k* L; \- c f' v
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
! w. W8 w6 j* N+ g: t& v4 r4 Muse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-; m& Z( Q8 z1 C( z. {
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for0 C4 N0 Y4 m! I7 `7 |+ i- j9 z
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed" N- T8 T9 l/ |# a! J; |9 b
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-4 B5 \5 t, X8 i3 U" z8 P, B
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
6 G! ~+ i! W( V9 R! A1 E) hsecondary to depression.
3 e; e* S! {) u# NThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
' }$ l) \7 e8 L! F9 EThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
+ U/ e |& Q, ^# achest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-0 Z8 z* Y% H5 @* a% ^: n
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.2 j6 U: \* h! L5 g; C
The father also admitted that after the phone call,' H, X+ g) u- C9 q- ^, u3 e
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby; g$ f, }4 S. P
was high, he then read the product information
! s! |5 a/ @7 Q4 Y: Ppacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
: v7 W, W/ r1 h2 C+ H4 |son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
5 J7 d2 I# a; V2 H4 S5 ]2 Z+ N5 ~decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
! K' B. e4 R3 o2 E. I6 A3 pfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had9 Q2 j& k& Z. O0 _) T( U+ K
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone6 V" P. }8 [4 Z0 X
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the1 Q5 R6 C2 V8 _& [# R2 ~
laboratory to obtain the test.# J& b2 I' h! v8 c& U
Discussion2 ]& Q. h& D0 l; L& U% Z
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary" C5 n1 l5 ]0 o6 d- a6 m) ?5 u
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
1 |- q# J; r: ]' CPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
5 g/ D6 W8 N* n: I+ hit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
& r- a( @( A! |, L. K7 J' wthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
d0 A& D$ Y! s$ f8 {$ lmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
9 Z$ E( W& M5 @8 k4 w; v9 ?may have a central nervous system lesion that is
3 L4 V9 E, y3 m& s% Wresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
# o, _- F9 Y- k! Wamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
" p$ c; n# S% E1 T! V. usis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in8 E f" |( n2 }) {5 w" ~/ K: i
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
9 a# g' v& Y& \/ c) f" bization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
' e3 |3 @. C- z! W4 srical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
' I5 p: ~' r; B7 ~* q) T; u; ggonadotropins.1,3
+ {/ O8 M% Q b0 KGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
6 `0 ?$ w$ ?8 N' V1 Ocious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate" q; m3 J: W1 O# o" A3 Q4 i& _
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
b8 L- X$ k$ r: W! vexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
: E% V% G! d" f7 ~/ `! }! nulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing3 e/ i% ?+ r6 ^# C% u1 }( V: j v+ V
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive0 u7 A+ x) [# i( C K
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
8 j, R' @' M# y9 Hpuberty in boys.3,4
* ~# O5 [7 Z* D5 d' u8 }9 I% q& jThe most common form of congenital adrenal3 k) q J. J7 A# E" ~
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.2 M& y! M, e6 v4 m* b
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in" l4 Q* m4 W) u! d
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,: d4 b5 {, Z7 Z$ R* F Q& d
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen4 B; A" f# Q1 i) k- q2 G. {4 ~% E# p0 W
excess.1,3, V5 x$ ~$ [4 n+ c. o) c7 S/ i
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
5 E1 I9 N# S0 y* V! Q542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007( b$ v4 Y ~8 u4 s
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
8 s3 ]- ]1 q" f4 K0 D( q& Uindependent precocious puberty, which is also known+ O9 V- {& S. a- b) g! |; ~
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
. @4 a7 J* V! k; C" pvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
3 i3 j3 R8 d) twith this disorder are full pubertal development,% c& f' a" {! o6 [5 ^
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
- s! o' N2 x! I+ Twith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
* N. @/ V; n$ f: F1 H" [! @are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
) F. G# Q6 f) I6 _pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
4 m. |& k/ A9 u0 |; l9 p# \! Nreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked1 c d" @" ^! s1 V
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
* T' H/ k/ L7 ~! R- n9 I. M& bmales; therefore, other male members of the family
# p0 ~" q; e! j4 C; Zmay have similar precocious puberty.3
+ ^$ j2 W+ x4 F9 _8 uIn our patient, physical examination was incon-9 O9 Y9 x) l+ z' o' q p; [
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-! P9 Q+ C, G( Z
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis C _9 h3 k& c! j7 v/ ]9 y' Z( s
was in the differential diagnosis because his father, z8 W2 n5 r- V( E+ ]
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,; G, q2 g+ z# ]$ r( l7 c( o
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
7 t# n. O* h1 T7 Ebeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-( a' m$ w* E- @. |4 a1 [0 W6 F
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our6 |' G2 D( p5 C" v
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
' D) _! Z$ s5 ceither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase, m7 P! q1 K3 ~5 ^* |$ D5 o
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
9 e) P# c: ~9 ?5 `- Q4 g0 ]ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
G5 n: U* q% YThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly# m* q! W: K) [7 r* ~
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because# K6 Y! p6 ]9 U3 X, M: e% ~: f# S" I
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
8 n; U' t, ^. I$ v; |! `5 \pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and! l0 H% j8 i6 M# J
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-' D _; I+ |+ ?+ B- f) {: Q
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
& @" x4 f8 q/ y o$ O: cusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’) r+ W" n, G, H" ^5 p; Z
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or8 P) _" {' p; h2 U! ^
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
7 ~5 z; E/ z9 ?5 V+ Nunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
9 n9 S7 ~% h @Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
0 m" `' m8 B3 Sbaseline value in those females who were exposed to
/ N8 {! A" `, G) {& ]; N. g. Leven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
; P+ h. \' I8 @partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
( k9 K, f7 x2 ]3 X/ xtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.' Z% h) e4 v) v; S2 k
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,( i9 m2 a/ |0 [' ~" Y0 u8 F) E: {1 @+ R
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
5 e- @5 e# \) @* ^) S2 W& e. h! Wdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
) W1 m# ~/ z8 E9 c; l3 vterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more) }6 ?; y5 G2 }5 C) r3 U8 b/ i
active in young children exposed to testosterone
( B# U' b: I D! G7 q) Uexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-2 S$ n' W3 V5 ]6 t* f/ I4 ] n' Z
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
' x' F" x* w( T% Lvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
) o0 _% T' W. M$ _: g/ X: Zchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
5 D+ D9 z) A' d/ J' @( f) R# oadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
% o9 _" t, H$ ?7 W' R5 ?9 OThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during) p- z( u6 V4 ?4 R, L
early childhood on pubertal development and final
. i! O5 u7 C! Y/ d$ Madult height are not fully known and always remain
( Q& `) V6 B0 R7 ^* _a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
2 H4 U" D& v* v# Z8 ^/ T3 r8 jterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some: e1 a" x1 N1 T' ^8 e9 p5 ~
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
8 ~9 C$ n4 j9 @1 Scessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation% x" [8 Y: b% \7 X2 G: f! {
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,96 d! _/ j! \* n* ], l$ d. ]
There are conflicting reports and controversy
0 M3 f; k0 \: T( \6 t( Sover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
& {) d7 f6 C3 A5 m' F% Z% Upenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
2 ?' O) n/ f, Y; w0 h+ q8 B+ Aadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-, Q" D3 t) l% V
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,, q3 m- R$ {! r* E/ a
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between2 v% N2 J' H1 D9 G2 U6 f
childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult5 b6 M6 G1 X5 m/ V
penile length in clinical studies.
; _$ ^/ Z2 S, a( \0 R0 P" p+ j# BNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is( H0 O1 g x2 F" r
going to experience any of the untoward effects from" D+ G8 S6 w4 ? ~, e/ I+ C, |
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
: A: c4 f3 X- l) othe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.6 D3 m( D1 }8 e% C3 X2 K- l6 V7 ?% P
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of& J6 p2 U' h& R" P! a# o6 `
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at3 T& [: y) R& P. H$ M
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
$ E" d" q* b; _0 vheight will not be affected.
% @# X9 Q' z t- QAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
0 P9 m8 ^1 O( I. Nability of androgen products in our society may
, N- k2 l- u- a6 |7 _' s% P7 ^5 {indeed cause more virilization in male or female: k. W5 ?) e2 n0 I
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
. { r; }* H1 E- p7 H8 rgen products must be considered and specific ques-
) _( ?/ E3 N* S3 R" D( i& rtioning about the use of a testosterone product or
- c6 U% u7 y5 ]+ Igel should be asked of the family members during3 j! Y6 w8 N) Z$ n
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-
. b/ R4 H* K- V Qilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-4 }6 f$ E& z+ Q- k) l& L7 f
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
0 M, E5 c0 i8 r3 c' z" l; [$ T( \appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
^3 q. s/ A5 w& bhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
5 g p0 j1 ^8 H8 ]8 Iresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
0 p& }+ W. Z- {( R0 f/ ?. B. Ninvestigation. The primary care physician should be
4 ~) n, v4 j) M3 |# [( V0 ^aware of this fact, because most of these children
, W6 g# G+ G9 N. B: D# |6 dmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
* q# M3 E3 ^5 F+ q! v0 B3 ~) y' uDesk Reference and package insert should also put a5 m% p/ i, i7 m# |
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
$ h# F( N4 o& H1 ffemale child who might come in contact with some-7 ?- Z% U- y1 j
one using any of these products.! g& l) j% {+ j5 E! {' Y5 V' [, S
References
1 J* i5 E9 g0 o$ \2 [# R9 ~( [1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation& M* w- v9 S: i. B/ Z9 R
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
$ T8 g" _" B+ ~1 n+ LEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;: y, D4 u& K* e F: A+ d, _7 U
2002: 565-628. n& S8 k9 E% a# R) ]+ P* h( B1 Q
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
( v' l4 e' E! q! L: B) J- Qpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|