- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
- }7 h" u6 O( R/ [3 V+ vBoy Induced by Indirect Topical$ y. n7 d+ G6 X9 N0 B9 u' P
Exposure to Testosterone' Z. V. l) S+ l9 Z8 h$ A
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
( E8 a8 }% E/ G# Band Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1' B# _/ J" J8 q5 p4 a2 o8 m
Clinical Pediatrics
I- o6 U4 A1 D/ [Volume 46 Number 6; o7 u/ T' H) q( }1 o" V
July 2007 540-5436 H6 s6 u# t' ?
© 2007 Sage Publications
2 p2 q7 d7 f* I; G' M& K+ ?8 J10.1177/0009922806296651
8 I; u# F/ S- o* X7 {+ }* f) `- W7 Dhttp://clp.sagepub.com
% }. V$ q& t6 b# d! Lhosted at7 t: A( _: C8 P( ]% R
http://online.sagepub.com% }/ y2 c8 q7 |
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,/ J9 b! c) V: `, P6 C8 J' q
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
6 i i, p/ x$ N+ m$ H6 jprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated# ]1 H# L) L1 L2 o3 |
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has7 M( H3 @: Q3 D" V7 m' w
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
/ _6 V- ?5 `8 d2 ?: j& m2 Y* Rlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
* f, D( o @& Z5 X1 ?by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
) ]4 s3 ]) S! B: rhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-' Q. X* O) p: \' y1 X% F. A. [" i
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
2 H; X3 k$ e, `- Ireport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the4 ^& v6 R; A, k: t6 t
enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-" {- N. [. M! T- E+ ~" [# P. c
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due' y) c7 o* t( U" ?9 D0 I9 A
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
* k" ^- r5 h& |/ v5 o( ^* ^the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
& ] ], y1 ~& @1 ?mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
7 T f* t. B$ y9 c8 W$ d! xchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
# V8 g, z5 f L- ]; Btestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-. n% f+ B# Z& v5 |( v! R
bly more common than the rare case report in the t/ q: C' x2 X
literature.4
7 }9 { }7 x. P; _8 h, D9 FPatient Report7 g, _1 c$ c, J, ?
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
" s9 g2 G% t* i1 m/ Zendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern$ \5 ]8 l0 q0 n: D% h) a
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
& g: C# h: B' G5 K& Clight colored pubic hair development when he was, ?2 A3 {2 k7 E: S9 c+ H* U8 J5 U4 {8 n
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
) n4 ^' _9 P" J% E5 K& y2 E/ gSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.; l+ [) F9 T' f0 p5 E3 X
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
5 q$ V: g3 ]& n2 K- cProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of8 ~: o# O$ b: x; B0 f, ~
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;7 n; X& i5 s. \7 C, H( b
e-mail: [email protected].
) F( N* I+ B+ {. M2 Nabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
0 Q& N' E' @# f8 H6 L u: h. Xdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
: f" c& T1 c4 m: u( V4 y, F) d7 ]8 e' ^ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
, V2 _2 f3 {1 K5 hwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
% X4 ?( w8 G5 ~+ f/ N3 T p7 V0 Aa birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
6 ]( l h9 C3 m9 V- y20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
9 V; x& v8 `/ k+ sof life and was still receiving breast milk along with; n0 z: p% `) s- K% e; E
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,+ b8 m9 s4 R, g: u7 h1 ^* [
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development; D9 b5 h. E: `% F9 o9 Y- [: t
was age appropriate.0 {* r& n( f% u! R! Z, i, I
The family history was remarkable for the father,* [" `6 S$ U7 C
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
g+ H# g4 e! t0 M1 lwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
. v/ H% ~7 l9 ~height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
' w9 `! [+ U- K; F- p! fearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
0 W; y1 H" p6 T! eThe father denied taking any other medication. The9 T' ?: z+ t2 Y( d! n5 L
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche4 h# I6 e7 r* s) s$ p
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet7 L9 b3 Z$ Y& m0 e' ^/ B* m9 }6 Y
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
# O5 E# e4 q$ d! P9 wcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-9 l# U. I W& ?& ^
tives. There were no siblings.
( E- R+ X( h2 z6 z: k8 t& kPhysical Examination
( ?1 ^! s* w2 F+ N( OThe physical examination revealed a very active,; Q7 Q$ J, h. s4 f8 T
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented( Y2 v& O- k( {) [! n
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was, M2 k$ T( J* C% D) c' L$ S
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
5 Y# A6 {5 v+ F. O3 J(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth) o0 `/ D+ C6 L* ?5 ^$ n& N8 b
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
r0 D; l1 [. ~$ ^7 ^the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
6 {2 w3 s j' J+ PThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for+ v3 S8 `3 h# K% ^" B
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of" T; Y" p7 L% c$ s! U1 `; X
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
0 g8 K- n5 q5 p1 W c# Odeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around4 h) f2 ]( A, a+ L
540* i, ~8 L) e4 M2 B' b# L' ?
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
6 B# ^0 h4 v: \% F ithe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The) }( d! P, a5 f% A
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
3 b! S0 P- Z' y! B0 ZThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat' Z& m3 u$ T0 C( F- E2 V3 I
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
+ y. A% a* [0 Rabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
* l) N; _5 ^0 B1 |2 [0 JNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
3 {0 w8 |% a9 zbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion9 J6 b: V! e6 z9 ^
of papilledema.
7 _. I0 G; [3 c" {4 l; {5 dLaboratory Evaluation. J) j c; I# Y$ l7 R
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
6 O _, L0 J6 ousing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
9 ~( n) a# @* Q0 p% Zlogic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
" Z4 v9 ]7 Z, j- O pkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test0 N) F4 d5 @) v' R, y+ |7 z5 e
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-- z- [/ \ h' C V) C: y
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
0 e6 C& T5 c+ y( ] _. FThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood4 ? X& K0 o" l# J
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
2 O3 Z/ k8 ^1 B& E5 m1 Ewithin normal range for his age. The concentration2 {0 B( J+ u. P) P1 M0 F1 {0 ]% @
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL& [" \6 m7 }* @- _3 I r6 w
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20' N# v5 t6 o" n; C0 } V' |
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-; ]: {) l) O' a5 ]; g
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
& l+ [' Y- d, }" l+ ~& d* V5 J5 ?desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
5 w+ w9 L1 b. `/ v+ B49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
8 w7 C: R5 P7 R) k0 [was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-2 [8 }' c" w* n0 p: u7 i
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
( K1 ~/ h$ n1 b+ F5 ]* }- stestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
) Z4 |$ e7 ]/ Y3 Z. Y2 o! E4 vand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than& W8 Y: m! M, N$ c7 U
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
8 ~! m4 c4 X: V( |7 Z% o/ K1 F, tstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone1 ^! g, n7 s! D J
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
) {7 i O9 r0 g, W+ Q) c(prepubertal).
0 q5 Z& m4 ]/ A3 V1 p2 @7 rThe parents were notified about the laboratory& ~ W; C8 c0 a8 j; \ W
results and were informed that all of the tests were
3 Y' _1 o" e; g7 _9 c$ \normal except the testosterone level was high. The
( l! T; }0 c' T% [! l$ f8 ufollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
3 H& V( F/ r7 ~/ L2 X: [obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-2 x2 L: h. q$ {' E) k- e
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.) i+ ]+ x+ w+ l! _! b. }8 e
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
% ~% R9 E( @! c3 G: v, `, Ychild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained" L+ o$ f; w: Y" A# q! B
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
7 ?( A& e. k: m$ a1 aunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
2 G* J- `$ n$ [- H9 ]pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at# w7 A7 C8 J( V' `
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2& P; d) @. D& I [; a
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.$ S' x$ G3 }- u# M* j: @9 J
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-3 _2 S& \7 `- v2 C& n0 E. p" ?
ing frequent erections.+ X9 g7 k& ]1 X& \" ~' M+ m, F
Both parents were again questioned about use of( w8 _7 |, \& y
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
# ^/ M' u0 w/ c2 [9 Wthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the( ^/ r/ U; U3 @
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
! M9 W: a) W# ?4 ?) U" ruse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
4 W4 ^, r, h- \0 _2 e, Hing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for. P9 v7 D3 V1 D5 I F6 _
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
/ T9 e/ |+ I9 {9 f6 q. y+ Sto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-( w7 x5 b5 V) f, C0 G! o
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
7 q# t6 F3 B$ ]$ [5 x7 k1 ssecondary to depression.
$ P, c& v% q+ |The child slept in the same bed with parents.2 D9 g: L! F6 d8 ]) F
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
' D) T8 d% \& c; R; H, uchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-& L; P& j- }3 F6 l* P; _! G
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
$ z2 D3 ^+ y _/ \1 l! q% jThe father also admitted that after the phone call,6 ~" o" r* G# ~- ~6 d) Y& }4 p
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby' U- J/ U# g1 |7 k
was high, he then read the product information4 s |5 e2 V$ t- W0 F# w! A
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-- D" z9 L! f c. L- d4 ?7 _
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
0 L, O8 q! o# `4 R" M$ Z5 Q1 U1 pdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the8 g% \, T3 m5 r! @! r# j. n9 I
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had1 A# U+ x. W) P0 }7 c' A+ R
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
, M+ Z: ~7 _. u( v- j4 c" Ftest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
3 q5 p) u% w( q9 S4 vlaboratory to obtain the test. `0 ~9 c5 n, n7 d5 S: i
Discussion
8 _6 I3 U$ u+ n! z; I8 z, _, yPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary. _3 y* T* u+ j7 _- o
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
+ A [1 w0 k. A% dPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when# f+ c/ F: ?, t
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
7 m& c0 J4 C/ t, Gthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
/ N( e) c% A5 a# F1 Xmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
" C5 a4 N3 C7 \4 E3 F8 E9 t3 tmay have a central nervous system lesion that is
- x! z( q# j5 L: x+ L, ~5 fresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-7 T# r9 j0 ^; A
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
. Y; I' s% K2 d8 X7 J# z6 u3 fsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
* h# V+ }5 P- F) Wboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
: m- b5 |: `! q7 ~ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-5 | `1 x% r: y3 |
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
8 |9 g3 K0 S& S' egonadotropins.1,3
4 e% }# J- j E- n, M( R" kGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-2 I7 Z# F+ i/ S8 E$ e: Q
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
6 ?0 s+ \5 k$ l& f: Zandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or
6 X9 z. D5 W! `: N6 qexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
: C7 n+ d9 ^" wulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
" H' B1 X6 q: `4 _congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive/ H- X6 S2 w2 T- q1 l
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious! ^$ v! u* l) j+ e( S% @, x7 F
puberty in boys.3,4" b4 I' { ~0 O y2 f: t0 u
The most common form of congenital adrenal C4 c7 J; J, r/ T4 l
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
5 w0 S$ V/ n' U9 e' DThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in3 q: R4 k) R6 I" ]+ v& G
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,; T4 c6 j e3 _- w4 H0 ~3 g3 e6 U
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
* K, E6 [" ?! {" V0 y; a: ?excess.1,3
! ^" a3 \8 r! K, M/ [at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from) g! T3 @% [' m# g9 m
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20078 k& B( P% l* \! h5 E
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
3 h: `0 j# ^" c1 [- ~# Z4 B0 L# H3 Vindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
$ ?" d& W( E; { Z1 J/ I4 has testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a2 Y7 X) V. _7 f
very young age. The physical findings in these boys
9 U& K9 P6 f6 i" x1 m' I; Rwith this disorder are full pubertal development,
1 M) w1 P; |5 xincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
- E" Y* E) j/ O" N) Ewith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder8 P- e8 W' Z, X8 Y4 L5 }
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
9 }: J6 @! a8 |. o0 K" T1 lpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
: O$ p8 I+ Z; `: `6 J" G; r" y& Q) Kreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked/ Q9 Z. k+ d# U" H/ u, b
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only' T& |1 Z5 A: q3 W: W6 p
males; therefore, other male members of the family+ [$ P* _, V2 X7 x F, D
may have similar precocious puberty.3
7 J, X7 g! t" m5 c$ ]# S8 XIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
+ b4 S# t G0 i* \/ U4 _4 ksistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
! T* M$ F( ^& gcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis" q& F" @' w2 N3 N! c
was in the differential diagnosis because his father# s0 k! I4 E% t4 c* ]; ~+ d
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
8 c5 e6 e) a5 ?& h: o! [6 Mtesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
& k7 Q8 w5 [/ |% F+ |7 h: a! ?beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
- f2 T* @" ~% {) g" qative initial history of androgen exposure, our
+ z2 {1 m: P# T, k3 z- Fbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia, i/ J9 I) M2 g) C) {+ m& f, D
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase6 {# p& h4 k2 i% ~
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
3 A+ _! c6 o: L( w7 x5 x# `4 aing the normal level of adrenal steroids.6 s. n" u; k, c# S
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
8 m, q/ k, R( B* w) m! Lsuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
* V2 A$ p- Q& h" A' [+ Xthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
. p; N& C! H( `+ rpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and) _: S) m' j+ E" D. [
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos- O/ o5 Y9 w% F, {. v3 e/ P1 U
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
# H) F( I8 O, Y, X! i7 {4 Husing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’ X. e& M6 `3 R- l* X* F- z
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or! I6 y7 Q1 z/ B/ `! M; r$ Y. u/ F
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
) s: j7 u4 `$ W* I8 n6 [! M) Sunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
- e7 X2 w5 u$ U$ ZSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
9 O9 d0 D# c& {baseline value in those females who were exposed to7 U* `" W' F& M( |* x/ k& f/ z& O: U( ^. l
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male. F4 [* K6 F& m% ^
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
7 D& \1 O) {& T6 K1 V# G7 Ution site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
0 U* o9 n) T7 o/ R% m [6 mOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,/ Y# T. k" ]8 d( j- {9 z
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that. t3 u4 U5 T7 B+ R6 m# X! m" E Q
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-4 b# \ n, ^7 A
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more* [/ f/ h. i& O2 E
active in young children exposed to testosterone
9 J- t* M# `( S, H2 fexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-) d- a: \! ~! H) v" h1 D% Q
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
, v! A& P A' a' p3 ?* ^9 S; o% lvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in% {8 W$ D' z) V( ^8 d
children results in an increase in growth velocity and' L4 i9 R1 X& i# W4 X4 Q
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
2 E* z+ ?, J l# L4 @' ?The long-term effect of androgen exposure during& }8 g' W; c; Q) E
early childhood on pubertal development and final
- {0 {+ I K* p, E% \: w! w; iadult height are not fully known and always remain
% a2 a, [9 _0 va concern. Children treated with short-term testos-; w* o$ U d7 D% v/ R
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some+ M4 [; u/ U3 H1 j' k- b) G# Y
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after+ u/ q9 U9 j4 x0 j- N6 L- m L
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
5 {* e9 x9 ]' b3 hdecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
) F" {- j! }0 X* { }4 T( y; U7 MThere are conflicting reports and controversy( D3 z2 @7 k9 @, @. l) U
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
$ V2 \3 x1 M* w( u+ r1 X! _penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal0 i7 n+ z: C- M: i G9 A! v
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-$ f! {3 S0 b* X% X
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,. A& z) J9 b3 G- z2 s# U6 I9 y
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
* h: E/ t, G! A/ A! b" V; j5 E1 Ochildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
+ @/ ^) q: O! Y) n$ Vpenile length in clinical studies.
l1 D$ f0 x# ^) J, sNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is: a$ |: `7 Z! v2 Z. I5 w. L
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
+ ^. J* @4 C9 ltestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because) x4 s! J' O( C! F, ]
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
6 H& q! k2 p7 `& k5 zAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
8 n6 [& o# E- O& ~diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at" [; }. G S: s- p
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult) W% J' M" h/ A* A1 u9 x
height will not be affected.
: U ?. D1 x* UAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-) k G1 y% A, y% L5 B
ability of androgen products in our society may+ H, v/ T, m$ W q+ z" S ?- H( i
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
( E4 f! d, Y, E8 d* P7 |; c, jchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
4 Z- _2 ]8 {- M- o W- W' }* mgen products must be considered and specific ques-
7 r+ s5 ^ L$ v; M0 E: S* ytioning about the use of a testosterone product or
! l0 q( j" ^& u$ d* `gel should be asked of the family members during1 m9 b4 ~+ h7 G! @. g
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-; \) l5 O8 m" q) ]- `' U" t
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-% l& N2 [0 I+ w) A$ ?
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by6 y% U2 s* u }
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
& c1 j% r! Z% G( l+ _0 ohistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
4 c5 A$ `; Q& L5 Z$ xresult in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
7 r8 I( V! `2 c8 T4 y/ cinvestigation. The primary care physician should be& a! `' N4 c5 ~" d
aware of this fact, because most of these children* o6 J0 K. B& e6 B2 @# Q
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
3 C, E ]3 @8 r' c* D' UDesk Reference and package insert should also put a" d7 `5 ]# u; T8 c. j* P8 `
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
* {. A' j) ]: |4 p. H* \9 Y! Tfemale child who might come in contact with some-" ^; r8 K2 Q5 \/ S- b/ g
one using any of these products.7 m( U: o3 G9 t* l1 T1 @5 E
References5 Z4 f( l, S8 A+ m4 M" C
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
' R. x; k# S5 k, z- `/ q# Gand puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
- G+ t; k! f3 v) W2 D+ V! g9 QEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;; ?) S( d. U0 |
2002: 565-628.
. l- A; J2 O. M/ I& j2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious( D3 O, O2 ]5 U
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|