- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old7 o) k' V" z8 g5 A
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
' D; E; @: v& h; h: WExposure to Testosterone
0 V' l- d- D ~: ]/ @+ iSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2) w4 K( X6 P$ j2 U8 G" ^$ A, R8 o* ~
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
0 b" B* z T+ q+ r& v9 {6 S0 L2 }Clinical Pediatrics, x) _/ I7 h3 K
Volume 46 Number 6
# {7 K3 q6 L" }July 2007 540-543( P# o. g1 j- J {1 F7 O& `
© 2007 Sage Publications
& ]' u+ |+ Y! k- L1 Z10.1177/0009922806296651- t( L* \0 I5 K/ X
http://clp.sagepub.com5 `- T0 O* D( p: F3 ]+ X
hosted at
* ^+ O. j! b2 v" w4 E; ~+ whttp://online.sagepub.com
; A u5 Y" B' g: J1 oPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
$ K5 w5 |2 N3 T# G4 m. qis a significant concern for physicians. Central
, s( G' w0 D- R, Hprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
; v, _( f7 @! gthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has5 Q2 f5 ~- t2 u& r9 X4 Y; a) v
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system! y; p1 t0 }9 B- V# B; ?
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested1 L( W1 ~3 k& z& o3 u
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
( Y9 F4 d4 ^& T: ~2 @0 f! ~hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
4 {7 ]" _* r8 xcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We: z- Z* M1 E/ R4 c* a
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
" t5 G% y! W3 \6 menlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
) p/ m$ A# d9 B6 }# v, |% l7 wment without testicular enlargement, which was due
9 V' P2 x8 f# ?2 _7 W: Ato the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
9 y# I+ U* w8 D7 |. K- Z! othe father. The family initially concealed this infor-" K( k# l5 G% W+ n3 P
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
, U* r. q" K5 ?+ D: lchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
9 o! m5 ^0 f2 {) e5 mtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
x0 b' m. ^9 Y7 rbly more common than the rare case report in the
/ |8 `0 t+ m/ l5 t. P& o4 H% e- @literature.4& ~' N% E1 ?/ G* g
Patient Report
' D4 b' N. D0 |" \9 q6 T# _A 16-month-old white child was referred to the, n5 ~& y$ p2 O3 P
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern2 u: H: d6 ~7 v) o
of early sexual development. His mother noticed$ _0 L r4 t0 H8 n
light colored pubic hair development when he was& w4 I. x* M& z; b- o. J- o
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
. P3 A* U1 o* ySouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.! e! t m( s2 t' j
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,* T* a7 ?; |0 j4 u
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of( w. X0 ~4 y$ Z
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;) B) j9 r/ d- v
e-mail: [email protected].
8 g! `# X+ L( t1 labout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
: J4 y0 F0 h( W* \& x" ^5 D( V3 e: Zdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
, A% z8 w0 b% M7 o" ^ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child7 S5 G( @1 C" u$ O: P# f/ s+ k
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
4 I* y$ j* i3 P. G/ ?a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of- u U1 `' o; q) g% n
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
" m# X- u3 H0 ~5 R$ u6 uof life and was still receiving breast milk along with0 _# p; y3 \# {
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,. `: ?, |+ D1 D2 v6 P! f
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development. L5 }+ z$ l5 \
was age appropriate.3 [! }, p5 j- e% Q9 a4 c1 o
The family history was remarkable for the father,6 C" |# h; T9 }8 @: H( ?$ T
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
2 j/ [4 A w- N( z1 F o: [which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
% S) M" o! p& f Z3 aheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
5 P4 p4 y4 |/ y: F1 @/ j& Jearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.7 a" ?; O, h. h. u1 \, r
The father denied taking any other medication. The' m: W% m. H) O* s- `& {, O
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche3 F" B7 n: D; V9 N
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet+ v" g8 ?- l! b& A$ e$ S& i S& P
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
) y; v. _4 M% E! D' i) Xcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
6 @4 `& F* p F2 |& G4 |tives. There were no siblings.
; z+ w7 T# c/ BPhysical Examination
4 c+ T8 Y7 A5 O! rThe physical examination revealed a very active,0 ~6 a( ~1 V6 G6 W8 [
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented. `2 i: O" f9 _! q+ G! X2 {* a1 B- C
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
+ j! p% v) N3 |3 f0 e+ {90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg8 \7 B1 M6 z, a# r) X
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
8 V, z7 D9 O% K: Bvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
! @% O2 k0 O. pthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
% t1 L. K& y/ I) K r1 `The genitourinary examination was remarkable for, Q1 ]) Q1 U! ^/ A4 q
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of, }3 d6 [7 A. o5 b# o6 R
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well0 d6 D+ Y4 x. m3 G+ J
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
/ Z$ R2 v2 w3 ~4 ?+ g, f* n540
% _7 j9 ?5 T$ \. `/ xat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
9 \0 m5 x- w5 t% n+ a% ithe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The* s \& l% \; j! g5 h/ L
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.0 s$ \ M# |( G% g4 o
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat8 ]/ m: o: ?5 v- I4 a, B/ D: g
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no4 G/ m" Q' b6 Q! B; G* D
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
% v6 @0 W( o2 j, NNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
9 f! a' B" a. `bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
! u( t& a; t+ { |8 g4 [of papilledema.( q% @6 N, p* w* F! h$ ?
Laboratory Evaluation
; p7 N1 I/ I; }3 W* k3 `The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
% ]: X5 v+ }( @6 `using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-
5 B w& N$ ^( s- {5 }logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
; ]6 e! ]5 [, x! wkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
, U& v9 {9 x( y4 i+ \# Ashowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
' ?/ C2 k; e3 @' v! x/ F$ \. Y' A/ k0 ylating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).8 g' H* k" o0 V6 e
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
% ^- H5 O N* u, ~# u8 uurea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
& [2 C p; d) Z' i: {$ j" y5 J' Jwithin normal range for his age. The concentration
+ L& {9 I3 e$ Cof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL( _; V* M- p5 h( T. E! H
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 209 a8 x# T; G6 L
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-3 V' ]& {! Z& p5 v/ B
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),( B- n% Z7 E& s. ~( P
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
* R9 o9 n7 h! a. e4 ?9 n! ^49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)4 M. G7 ], L: ^: c# F- D
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-7 T1 g7 n- z" ~+ d% O
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
) ]; `% a, W/ l3 H' T( g& stestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),, v) c5 g2 |5 R4 N# a, U% h
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than- F2 `( G0 t$ B3 c8 A. W
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
H8 a6 {$ _/ [ l7 K) }1 g6 }stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
1 F! m3 K7 O& u0 }concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL7 K- M1 d! F, |
(prepubertal).
9 u& t) I7 I i$ m6 q% M4 ^" OThe parents were notified about the laboratory8 x9 A% n4 m2 G% @
results and were informed that all of the tests were
6 n, T7 p' {0 Q; s. Tnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
1 _+ z. K- V& L! Y7 ^/ ]follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to* z( a" T; D; g2 p5 L' s0 g
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-6 s& u# S5 A4 K f, v% R2 E. t! o
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.1 c& X/ B( D4 H$ u ?/ O
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
5 R5 D$ E/ U( B# p8 dchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained3 p% J5 |; d9 T! U! `5 L( b& B- y# k6 Z% R
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
7 G! ^) e& {$ c/ sunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-2 I! e/ `; ? J( _! e4 G1 _, ]4 y
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at( v5 q' J! u: L0 E3 T( u; D: X3 p
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
' m2 Z a# e2 ?/ x4 L% pmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
% X: G( ^6 U! N1 {9 r5 Y5 t4 Q8 IThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
7 T, \ u2 {/ b. r- h% ~ Oing frequent erections.
4 v6 c2 h J/ W' M3 L# tBoth parents were again questioned about use of
% Y- Y' J( G8 [/ ~any ointment/creams that they may have applied to( o% u& f& a! D$ {/ B$ o
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
. M2 F8 k! e6 V$ E4 h, F% xTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5414 W, B3 F* p5 u+ }3 r9 D. u$ `
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-, e: X' Q4 |7 ]8 x( j# A8 l0 @: g
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for, {$ G* u9 q5 a8 W" c: F
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
B; w3 e3 J& J6 {: D" j% d' yto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-; F" w4 U7 @8 D ^# n6 @
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido3 b% B5 R( }. O" x* }
secondary to depression.
0 u; z& `1 a$ K D; |The child slept in the same bed with parents.
R& P3 S6 m2 w. N' @The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
; r+ r" a3 B1 {5 d' Schest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
0 o' k k' @$ l' q+ `9 i8 C8 x% ?nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
7 d. i$ C S, z+ @& U$ T1 z( E3 I+ zThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
# I( u7 H* ]0 N1 g$ Vwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby
" Q; `4 l9 [ e) A* B8 t: i- Bwas high, he then read the product information* X7 k) q/ o4 Y
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-$ e f7 n8 A% r4 B' b7 S9 k
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they$ ~, i( z" s# `1 V- F m1 ?
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the" t( {) `. w; t, K' w9 w+ |% W F
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had7 Z7 H7 d- n; B* H9 X
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone9 U9 l, _1 w' H9 Z
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
$ E- ?9 u7 {+ e( Q& f7 R1 ulaboratory to obtain the test.# G l1 N) k0 W6 @
Discussion+ l" I, [+ c' t5 X/ S0 L1 ^
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary6 d* W. c6 B$ b
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
F0 u+ R8 V& oPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when8 c$ P. Z3 O7 H% t; N
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
4 W9 U% |3 E% m$ G x' B. E& Rthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
3 N, `% m( L& o- p5 [& amon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
" W% M% n5 B, S5 dmay have a central nervous system lesion that is4 V ~, T6 C6 y- N
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
0 K6 i- @1 z |3 |& {/ |1 hamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
9 p4 P* v, U% `! b! t, ~sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in0 t3 f& [# m% M$ }
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
1 D' C! `) j( Wization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
3 u/ @$ v& J3 {4 srical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
2 n7 Z8 K; Y! l( c$ u! ]gonadotropins.1,3% r) f5 @: }$ y
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-8 X Y. e+ U( i7 f2 l" m
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate" X, B9 Z( g* }1 v: [" }* q, ]# Z
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
( t j) x% C$ J* ^exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
# J" j# g& c; B7 w) Vulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing: |0 n" \% g' D- w
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
; V3 B) n$ N" q$ A, ^2 k. ~adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious0 H8 ]( z- H1 _) j3 ]
puberty in boys.3,4, z5 G! c( ?# y& e
The most common form of congenital adrenal
2 m/ d, r$ R0 j' X+ V4 Ahyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
8 u5 Q& ]* |" j' k& E. z. i9 CThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
1 i* W5 T9 G/ w& u$ `9 `2 [0 P8 Iexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
; R# z) D8 c1 H1 w# jan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen+ c) f$ Q0 B# l5 f8 p; }0 d
excess.1,3' i$ A- R; `5 [3 \% K2 ~
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
7 D4 y/ i- X k542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20077 z0 X1 E. x; G* W
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
& V d( p6 c3 Q. M9 Y1 P) Xindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
# z* D7 h2 ?2 ~as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
) G. n1 `( z0 r- l$ V$ A: u8 ivery young age. The physical findings in these boys
- I6 H/ o( B2 S/ j& T2 P/ Rwith this disorder are full pubertal development,
+ |( |. `; i5 B `# I2 V1 [including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
6 n0 l j1 v7 |; H5 n9 U ]with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder" @; {: `9 [$ C; J% a8 c+ T
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
: R, a& v" I+ J6 Bpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-+ f1 g ?+ F$ p8 U/ l: d6 }0 \
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
$ r/ C2 b# g. Hautosomal dominant disorder that affects only4 A1 F- W6 U8 W: r4 Y
males; therefore, other male members of the family6 z: M/ ^1 `( W# P9 l
may have similar precocious puberty.3+ I5 h8 i, b( p
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
! [( ]* k; N' Z# t: C' K1 k% j6 esistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
0 y8 Z7 B" r1 wcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
; d0 Y1 Q( |0 O; u9 l% m# E$ l6 Xwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
6 s- X5 \1 o1 E. E! }" ^started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,$ e& N) ]5 o- i( g" Y
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
$ {& S6 u, D& \& e# f% Zbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
5 ~: I" w. P; r9 c- k8 a m) Bative initial history of androgen exposure, our% j$ W M; C: t# z; I, x3 x
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
o' V8 G& T7 L S7 [9 Seither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase$ I7 w1 T4 D+ I! t: u
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
$ o5 L$ i6 Q& H1 N4 |5 fing the normal level of adrenal steroids.2 ]8 e1 a# N% e; V1 H
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
( a, U* `+ Y3 Q, N4 `6 D/ xsuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
, @0 M( {+ t& G. j) t* G4 Pthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
) {7 {3 O3 _; ~- Z; upearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and1 H& ]6 D) l1 E) F; t9 z! n- v
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-: ]3 `+ Y/ h1 m/ l
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
) l9 a; I- V" T6 d, Rusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
8 w/ C' L. [% D! \% ?' k D: T$ a, PDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
! k1 R& }. P0 a$ w; l/ jcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to: x1 _( d. Q* U9 e8 r
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.. w! |3 ~1 a! M& H& q, N: [
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the! S/ h2 B6 c# O1 ^0 g
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
, c: L9 [( D5 t& q" |even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
: h9 L5 ?; t' b$ V/ ?9 o% I& ?, {partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-0 W- r7 m* l; O1 M% L. X/ B
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
: |! W! `, k: Y5 @2 G7 LOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,+ h7 |1 M1 R+ m; K k2 G
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
8 ]- ]' n d; Hdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-' V9 H, u' ?% C' X
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
! I# [& `) f/ V! R+ yactive in young children exposed to testosterone
" Z6 |+ {& l& M9 Y9 J) Zexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-/ ^1 T# J/ z2 a* o6 Y
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to6 S: L7 ~% r! o7 G
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in4 I2 b" ^5 y+ h+ V
children results in an increase in growth velocity and) V! F: S( y2 }0 A$ Y
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
! S6 u6 P/ X. b- \1 `0 {- }The long-term effect of androgen exposure during- C; _9 l, ^! q" }, g+ ]( p& w! A/ m
early childhood on pubertal development and final
. u6 C- i+ L2 sadult height are not fully known and always remain
7 K& V5 l3 x& {, x; t- Aa concern. Children treated with short-term testos-5 x( o/ @* ^) y% k5 v
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some$ ^6 ^2 N9 e/ q: P% T
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after# Y4 q8 E5 Z" {$ j
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation2 ~; X/ r4 B* |: o
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9 T3 R$ d5 ]$ n* }
There are conflicting reports and controversy
+ @; k/ N7 S* \9 O% tover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult
" J% X' w& F' I, ?* zpenile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal5 A( d2 P7 T( N
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
7 Z4 `6 L4 }' @6 `5 z! e8 Hulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
/ O3 |/ m0 R8 P2 {* oSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
6 K* v% p7 e/ T4 s9 E: Kchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
/ ?- ^0 v5 F+ a7 N6 r$ apenile length in clinical studies.( W* t; O% Q! x
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
- L9 c D& W$ V( r6 p* \* Zgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from a+ i7 {# d }7 \
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because$ P: i" w6 H1 m; o: z0 B. o
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
3 z2 N& L, ^2 U6 sAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of
, N5 d' |& s* N5 Q7 \diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
- y; M5 |2 v5 H* b# e& cthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult; w0 h* z$ F2 e
height will not be affected.1 w' e: _; r5 l. n8 O
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-4 k- _, D( E! X
ability of androgen products in our society may; B; w& B: |. j5 t- g3 w1 R, k
indeed cause more virilization in male or female- N) F% N, I1 V; Q; q
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-2 ~2 _: [1 H; U' m
gen products must be considered and specific ques-5 D+ P( H& h0 X
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
8 H3 T4 a0 \$ ?+ i) u( y& Pgel should be asked of the family members during
0 o, q; }5 [# V: ?the evaluation of any children who present with vir-. R: [) `8 S! B2 @$ H
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-3 T3 d: y; Z1 H. o/ q$ o, K
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by/ E; B8 C% b6 J* L" q: B# n
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
: f9 F3 D' u2 A5 f6 c& _history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may. m+ C, M; c: I: K, h( ^0 `, W! J
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
0 |: p2 y+ a3 f( zinvestigation. The primary care physician should be
+ L% A! g8 ^1 [) b$ R) g1 N3 o$ Saware of this fact, because most of these children0 l2 D" n2 s; U( f. Z
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
! D. v M! O$ B/ r1 }: x; M' I6 V, [Desk Reference and package insert should also put a& q" L- Y7 X6 Z7 q
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or& Y0 c- c( b9 J9 V+ Q1 T5 x
female child who might come in contact with some-6 m" ]; |! Y1 A7 q
one using any of these products.! M8 m, P* z& T5 P
References1 x" h1 E3 r) I3 H6 |2 Q$ `
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation) n& V Q- o: H/ K. P
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric* N8 u$ x. [8 [2 _, T+ r, _: k
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
9 q4 E$ s3 @* I" _2002: 565-628./ R' E5 [2 u5 w( f
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
! C" L" A7 K+ C4 j/ i: f# |3 ]puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|